Lent 12

So this is it, the ‘great multitude’ that Matthew describes, who came ‘from the chief priests and elders of the people,’ bearing ‘swords and staves.’ They look like an unlikely bunch of losers and reprobates to me.

It might be as well to see what the other gospels say about them. Mark says almost exactly the same as Matthew. They are two of the synoptic gospels, after all, meaning in this case that they tell more or less the same stories from more or less the same point of view, probably because they have a common source (it is usually believed that Matthew and Luke based their accounts on Mark). Here is Mark 14:43, with only one or two words different from Matthew:

And immediately, while he yet spake, cometh Judas, one of the twelve, and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and the scribes and the elders.

We still have a great multitude… How about Luke 22:47?

And while he yet spake, behold a multitude, and he that was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them, and drew near unto Jesus to kiss him.

Some extra information here – the mode of betrayal – but we still have a ‘multitude,’ even if it is not ‘great.’ So how about the remaining, non-synoptic, gospel? Here is John 18:3:

Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.

That’s what they are. They are a ‘band of men and officers’. Have a look and try and work out which is which.

Having said all that, it’s important to remember that all of the quotations I have given you are not the original version – they are from a translation, and a very specific one at that: the King James Version, published in 1611. It may not be the most accurate, and certainly not the most recent (!), but it is the one I prefer, and one of the foundation stones of the English language. Whatever the originals actually say, and however we would interpret that today, our artist has definitely painted ‘a band of men’ and not ‘a great multitude’. Although they don’t have ‘lanterns and torches’ in the plural, they do at least have one lantern, and they also have ‘weapons.’ Admittedly Matthew and Mark do both mention ‘swords and staves.’  I’m not sure I would care to distinguish between the ‘men’ and the ‘officers’ though, they all look equally disreputable. They remind me of one of the incompetent bands of local militia that Shakespeare writes into plays like Much Ado about Nothing, Measure for Measure and Love’s Labours Lost: even if they achieve results it is not through any ability or efficiency on their own part. However, there is a difference. For Shakespeare, these people are a comic sub-plot. Here, the mocking is to belittle the evil this rabble does. They can’t even dress themselves – two have no trousers (or 16th Century equivalent), which is a common way to undermine someone, ‘catching them with their trousers down,’ and at least one of them – probably more – has come out without any shoes. They seem hesitant, reluctant even. But ultimately, that won’t stop them from being violent. They all have weapons – swords, staves, spears and halberds – and several also have helmets. They could strike at a distance, and not run the risk of injury. And yet – there are only eight of them. Surely the apostles, if we got all twelve, or rather, the remaining eleven, would be able to take them on? But that’s not the point, really, is it? I mean, imagine if Jesus hadn’t been arrested. Suddenly everything would stop working. The story fails. There is no sacrifice, there is no salvation. Jesus had prayed, ‘O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt,’ (Lent 10) and this is the result – so now he will go quietly.

Published by drrichardstemp

I talk about art...

6 thoughts on “Lent 12

  1. It is interesting to compare this detail with Caravaggio’s The Taking of Christ. They both portray this episode from the bible but the larger painting has no sense of where it is taking place. The soldiers could be part of a multitude and an apostle is fleeing. But they both have one lantern. If the inevitable happens then is Judas just playing his part?


    1. Yes, a very different painting from a very different time – and a slightly different episode. It concentrates of the drama and the humanity of the betrayal, a close up shot. It doesn’t matter where we are but what is happening. As for Judas, well – yes – it wouldn’t have been possible without him. Someone had to do it. Theologians are ‘conflicted’ about this one!


  2. They are a terrible looking crew and I can’t help thinking that a part of Judas, who looks dignified by comparison, must be wondering as he looks back at them what he has got himself into

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Lent 10/11/12 have built up a powerful series of dramatic scenes unfolding in the Garden, sustained by the New Testament texts : thank you so much Richard !
    The strong image of a(?Roman) spear in the forefront is a reminder of the Roman power overshadowing events ?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m so glad you are enjoying it! And yes, possibly Roman. The spear to the right of Judas looks rather like the spear in front of the Garden of Gethsemane – but I have a suspicion it’s not the same one… or, at least, not held by the same person in both cases.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: